mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-07-24 05:30:58 +03:00
Initial commit - 611 cybersecurity skills across all subdomains
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: building-cloud-security-posture-management
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
This skill guides security architects through designing and implementing a cloud
|
||||
security posture management program that continuously monitors infrastructure
|
||||
configurations across AWS, Azure, and GCP. It covers selecting CSPM tooling such
|
||||
as Wiz, Prisma Cloud, or native services, defining policy baselines, automating
|
||||
drift detection, and integrating posture findings into SOC workflows.
|
||||
domain: cybersecurity
|
||||
subdomain: cloud-security
|
||||
tags: [cspm, cloud-misconfiguration, security-posture, drift-detection, multi-cloud-governance]
|
||||
version: 1.0.0
|
||||
author: mahipal
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Building Cloud Security Posture Management
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- When an organization lacks visibility into cloud misconfigurations across multiple accounts and providers
|
||||
- When compliance requirements demand continuous posture monitoring against CIS, NIST, or SOC 2 frameworks
|
||||
- When security teams need to prioritize which misconfigurations to remediate based on actual risk
|
||||
- When migrating workloads to the cloud and establishing security baselines before production deployment
|
||||
- When integrating cloud posture findings into an existing SOC or SIEM platform
|
||||
|
||||
**Do not use** for runtime threat detection (see detecting-cloud-threats-with-guardduty), for application-level vulnerability scanning (see securing-serverless-functions), or for network traffic analysis (see implementing-cloud-network-segmentation).
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- Cloud accounts across target providers (AWS, Azure, GCP) with read-only API access for CSPM tools
|
||||
- Defined compliance framework requirements (CIS Benchmarks, NIST 800-53, PCI-DSS, SOC 2)
|
||||
- SIEM or ticketing system for finding ingestion and workflow management
|
||||
- Budget allocation for commercial CSPM tooling or engineering capacity for native tool integration
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Assess Current Cloud Estate and Risk Appetite
|
||||
|
||||
Inventory all cloud accounts, subscriptions, and projects. Classify them by data sensitivity, regulatory requirements, and business criticality to determine CSPM coverage scope.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Cloud Estate Inventory:
|
||||
+----------------+----------+------------+--------------------+------------------+
|
||||
| Provider | Accounts | Workloads | Data Classification| Compliance Needs |
|
||||
+----------------+----------+------------+--------------------+------------------+
|
||||
| AWS | 45 | Production | Confidential | PCI-DSS, SOC 2 |
|
||||
| AWS | 12 | Dev/Test | Internal | SOC 2 |
|
||||
| Azure | 8 | Production | Restricted (PII) | GDPR, SOC 2 |
|
||||
| GCP | 3 | Analytics | Confidential | SOC 2 |
|
||||
+----------------+----------+------------+--------------------+------------------+
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Select and Deploy CSPM Tooling
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluate CSPM solutions based on multi-cloud support, policy coverage, agentless scanning, attack path analysis, and integration capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
**Native Tools:**
|
||||
- AWS Security Hub CSPM with Config rules
|
||||
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud CSPM
|
||||
- Google Security Command Center Premium
|
||||
|
||||
**Commercial Platforms:**
|
||||
- Wiz: Agentless, graph-based visibility, attack path analysis, highest market mindshare (20.2%)
|
||||
- Prisma Cloud (now Cortex Cloud): CSPM + CWP + CIEM, 3,000+ built-in policies
|
||||
- Orca Security: SideScanning technology, agentless full-stack visibility
|
||||
- Lacework: Anomaly-based detection with behavioral analysis
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Example: Deploy Wiz connector for AWS using CloudFormation
|
||||
aws cloudformation create-stack \
|
||||
--stack-name wiz-connector \
|
||||
--template-url https://wiz-advanced-security.s3.amazonaws.com/wiz-aws-connector.yaml \
|
||||
--parameters ParameterKey=ExternalId,ParameterValue=<wiz-external-id> \
|
||||
--capabilities CAPABILITY_NAMED_IAM
|
||||
|
||||
# Example: Configure Prisma Cloud AWS onboarding
|
||||
# Prisma Cloud uses a cross-account IAM role for read-only access
|
||||
aws iam create-role \
|
||||
--role-name PrismaCloudReadOnly \
|
||||
--assume-role-policy-document '{
|
||||
"Version": "2012-10-17",
|
||||
"Statement": [{
|
||||
"Effect": "Allow",
|
||||
"Principal": {"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::188619942792:root"},
|
||||
"Action": "sts:AssumeRole",
|
||||
"Condition": {"StringEquals": {"sts:ExternalId": "<prisma-external-id>"}}
|
||||
}]
|
||||
}'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Define Policy Baselines and Custom Rules
|
||||
|
||||
Map compliance framework controls to CSPM policies. Create custom rules for organization-specific requirements that go beyond standard benchmarks.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# Example custom CSPM policy definitions
|
||||
policies:
|
||||
- name: s3-bucket-encryption-required
|
||||
description: All S3 buckets must have AES-256 or KMS encryption enabled
|
||||
provider: aws
|
||||
resource_type: aws_s3_bucket
|
||||
severity: HIGH
|
||||
rule: |
|
||||
resource.encryption.rules[0].apply_server_side_encryption_by_default.sse_algorithm
|
||||
in ["aws:kms", "AES256"]
|
||||
remediation: Enable default encryption on the S3 bucket using AES-256 or AWS KMS
|
||||
compliance_mapping:
|
||||
- CIS_AWS_v5.0: "2.1.1"
|
||||
- PCI_DSS: "3.4"
|
||||
- SOC2: "CC6.1"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: public-ip-not-attached-to-compute
|
||||
description: Production compute instances must not have public IP addresses
|
||||
provider: aws
|
||||
resource_type: aws_ec2_instance
|
||||
severity: CRITICAL
|
||||
rule: |
|
||||
resource.public_ip_address == null AND
|
||||
resource.tags["Environment"] == "production"
|
||||
remediation: Remove public IP and route traffic through a load balancer or NAT gateway
|
||||
|
||||
- name: storage-account-private-endpoint
|
||||
description: Azure storage accounts must use private endpoints only
|
||||
provider: azure
|
||||
resource_type: azurerm_storage_account
|
||||
severity: HIGH
|
||||
rule: |
|
||||
resource.network_rules.default_action == "Deny" AND
|
||||
resource.private_endpoint_connections.length > 0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Automate Drift Detection and Alerting
|
||||
|
||||
Configure continuous scanning intervals, drift detection thresholds, and alert routing to ensure new misconfigurations are detected within minutes of resource creation or modification.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# AWS Config rule for drift detection on S3 public access
|
||||
aws configservice put-config-rule \
|
||||
--config-rule '{
|
||||
"ConfigRuleName": "s3-bucket-public-read-prohibited",
|
||||
"Source": {
|
||||
"Owner": "AWS",
|
||||
"SourceIdentifier": "S3_BUCKET_PUBLIC_READ_PROHIBITED"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Scope": {"ComplianceResourceTypes": ["AWS::S3::Bucket"]}
|
||||
}'
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto-remediation using SSM Automation
|
||||
aws configservice put-remediation-configurations \
|
||||
--remediation-configurations '[{
|
||||
"ConfigRuleName": "s3-bucket-public-read-prohibited",
|
||||
"TargetType": "SSM_DOCUMENT",
|
||||
"TargetId": "AWS-DisableS3BucketPublicReadWrite",
|
||||
"Automatic": true,
|
||||
"MaximumAutomaticAttempts": 3,
|
||||
"RetryAttemptSeconds": 60
|
||||
}]'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Prioritize Findings with Context-Aware Risk Scoring
|
||||
|
||||
Move beyond severity-only prioritization. Use attack path analysis, asset context, and exploitability data to focus remediation on findings that represent actual risk.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Risk Prioritization Matrix:
|
||||
+----------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+-------------+
|
||||
| Finding | Severity | Exposed | Attack | Priority |
|
||||
| | | Internet? | Path? | Score |
|
||||
+----------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+-------------+
|
||||
| S3 bucket public read | HIGH | Yes | Yes | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| RDS no encryption at rest | HIGH | No | No | MEDIUM |
|
||||
| SG allows 0.0.0.0/0:22 | HIGH | Yes | Yes | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| CloudTrail not enabled | MEDIUM | No | No | HIGH |
|
||||
| EBS volume not encrypted | MEDIUM | No | No | LOW |
|
||||
+----------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+-------------+
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 6: Integrate with SOC Workflows and Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
Feed CSPM findings into SIEM platforms, create Jira tickets for remediation tracking, and build executive dashboards for posture trending.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Export findings to Amazon Security Lake in OCSF format
|
||||
aws securitylake create-subscriber \
|
||||
--subscriber-name cspm-siem-integration \
|
||||
--sources '[{"awsLogSource": {"sourceName": "SH_FINDINGS"}}]' \
|
||||
--subscriber-identity '{"principal": "arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/SIEMIngestionRole", "externalId": "siem-ext-id"}'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
| Term | Definition |
|
||||
|------|------------|
|
||||
| CSPM | Cloud Security Posture Management: continuous monitoring service that identifies cloud infrastructure misconfigurations and compliance violations |
|
||||
| Configuration Drift | Deviation from a defined security baseline that occurs when resources are modified outside of approved change management processes |
|
||||
| Attack Path | A multi-step chain of misconfigurations and vulnerabilities that an adversary could exploit to move from an entry point to a critical asset |
|
||||
| Agentless Scanning | CSPM approach that uses cloud provider APIs and snapshot analysis to assess security posture without installing agents on workloads |
|
||||
| Policy as Code | Defining security policies in machine-readable formats (Rego, YAML, JSON) that can be version-controlled and automatically enforced |
|
||||
| Compliance Framework | Structured set of security controls and requirements such as CIS Benchmarks, NIST 800-53, PCI-DSS, or SOC 2 used to measure posture |
|
||||
| Security Graph | Graph database representing relationships between cloud resources, identities, network paths, and vulnerabilities for contextual risk analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
## Tools & Systems
|
||||
|
||||
- **Wiz**: Agentless CNAPP providing graph-based CSPM, attack path analysis, and vulnerability management across all major cloud providers
|
||||
- **Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud**: Palo Alto Networks CNAPP with 3,000+ built-in policies covering CSPM, CWP, CIEM, and IaC security
|
||||
- **AWS Security Hub CSPM**: Native AWS posture management with automated checks against CIS v5.0 and AWS Foundational Security Best Practices
|
||||
- **Prowler**: Open-source AWS/Azure/GCP security assessment tool with 300+ checks and CIS benchmark support
|
||||
- **Steampipe**: Open-source SQL-based cloud configuration querying tool supporting 140+ plugins for multi-cloud posture queries
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario: Post-Acquisition Cloud Posture Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Context**: A company acquires a startup with 30 AWS accounts and 5 GCP projects. No CSPM tooling is in place and the security team needs to assess the inherited environment within two weeks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Approach**:
|
||||
1. Deploy an agentless CSPM tool (Wiz or Orca) using read-only cross-account roles for immediate visibility without agent installation
|
||||
2. Run initial scans against CIS Benchmarks for both AWS and GCP to establish a baseline posture score
|
||||
3. Identify Critical findings: publicly exposed databases, unencrypted storage with sensitive data, overprivileged service accounts
|
||||
4. Prioritize attack paths that connect internet-exposed resources to data stores containing customer PII
|
||||
5. Deliver an executive summary with risk-ranked findings and a 90-day remediation roadmap
|
||||
6. Integrate the acquired accounts into the existing CSPM platform with continuous monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
**Pitfalls**: Deploying agents for the initial assessment adds weeks of delay. Using only native tools for a multi-cloud assessment creates separate dashboards and makes cross-cloud comparison difficult.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Cloud Security Posture Assessment Report
|
||||
==========================================
|
||||
Organization: Acme Corp
|
||||
Cloud Providers: AWS (57 accounts), Azure (8 subscriptions), GCP (3 projects)
|
||||
CSPM Platform: Wiz
|
||||
Assessment Date: 2025-02-23
|
||||
|
||||
OVERALL POSTURE SCORE: 68/100
|
||||
|
||||
FINDINGS BY SEVERITY:
|
||||
Critical: 47 (Internet-exposed + data access risk)
|
||||
High: 234 (Misconfiguration with limited exposure)
|
||||
Medium: 891 (Non-compliant but low immediate risk)
|
||||
Low: 1,567 (Informational or best practice)
|
||||
|
||||
TOP ATTACK PATHS:
|
||||
1. Internet -> Public S3 Bucket (PII data) -> No encryption
|
||||
Affected: 3 accounts | Risk: Critical | ETA to remediate: 1 day
|
||||
2. Internet -> EC2 (SSH open) -> IAM Role -> Cross-Account Admin
|
||||
Affected: 1 account | Risk: Critical | ETA to remediate: 2 days
|
||||
3. Internet -> Azure App Service -> SQL Server (public endpoint)
|
||||
Affected: 2 subscriptions | Risk: Critical | ETA to remediate: 3 days
|
||||
|
||||
COMPLIANCE STATUS:
|
||||
CIS AWS v5.0: 62% compliant (340/548 controls passing)
|
||||
CIS Azure v4.0: 71% compliant (189/266 controls passing)
|
||||
CIS GCP v4.0: 58% compliant (87/150 controls passing)
|
||||
SOC 2 Type II: 74% controls mapped and passing
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user