mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-07-18 05:29:40 +03:00
Initial commit - 611 cybersecurity skills across all subdomains
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: detecting-suspicious-powershell-execution
|
||||
description: Detect suspicious PowerShell execution patterns including encoded commands, download cradles, AMSI bypass attempts, and constrained language mode evasion.
|
||||
domain: cybersecurity
|
||||
subdomain: threat-hunting
|
||||
tags: [threat-hunting, mitre-attack, powershell, execution, t1059, amsi, proactive-detection]
|
||||
version: "1.0"
|
||||
author: mahipal
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Detecting Suspicious Powershell Execution
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- When proactively hunting for indicators of detecting suspicious powershell execution in the environment
|
||||
- After threat intelligence indicates active campaigns using these techniques
|
||||
- During incident response to scope compromise related to these techniques
|
||||
- When EDR or SIEM alerts trigger on related indicators
|
||||
- During periodic security assessments and purple team exercises
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- EDR platform with process and network telemetry (CrowdStrike, MDE, SentinelOne)
|
||||
- SIEM with relevant log data ingested (Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel)
|
||||
- Sysmon deployed with comprehensive configuration
|
||||
- Windows Security Event Log forwarding enabled
|
||||
- Threat intelligence feeds for IOC correlation
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Formulate Hypothesis**: Define a testable hypothesis based on threat intelligence or ATT&CK gap analysis.
|
||||
2. **Identify Data Sources**: Determine which logs and telemetry are needed to validate or refute the hypothesis.
|
||||
3. **Execute Queries**: Run detection queries against SIEM and EDR platforms to collect relevant events.
|
||||
4. **Analyze Results**: Examine query results for anomalies, correlating across multiple data sources.
|
||||
5. **Validate Findings**: Distinguish true positives from false positives through contextual analysis.
|
||||
6. **Correlate Activity**: Link findings to broader attack chains and threat actor TTPs.
|
||||
7. **Document and Report**: Record findings, update detection rules, and recommend response actions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
| Concept | Description |
|
||||
|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| T1059.001 | PowerShell |
|
||||
| T1059.003 | Windows Command Shell |
|
||||
| T1562.001 | Disable or Modify Tools |
|
||||
|
||||
## Tools & Systems
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|---------|
|
||||
| CrowdStrike Falcon | EDR telemetry and threat detection |
|
||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Advanced hunting with KQL |
|
||||
| Splunk Enterprise | SIEM log analysis with SPL queries |
|
||||
| Elastic Security | Detection rules and investigation timeline |
|
||||
| Sysmon | Detailed Windows event monitoring |
|
||||
| Velociraptor | Endpoint artifact collection and hunting |
|
||||
| Sigma Rules | Cross-platform detection rule format |
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Scenario 1**: Base64 encoded PowerShell command launched by macro document
|
||||
2. **Scenario 2**: IEX download cradle fetching payload from C2 server
|
||||
3. **Scenario 3**: AMSI bypass via reflection patching before payload execution
|
||||
4. **Scenario 4**: PowerShell Empire agent communicating with C2
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Hunt ID: TH-DETECT-[DATE]-[SEQ]
|
||||
Technique: T1059.001
|
||||
Host: [Hostname]
|
||||
User: [Account context]
|
||||
Evidence: [Log entries, process trees, network data]
|
||||
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
|
||||
Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
|
||||
Recommended Action: [Containment, investigation, monitoring]
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user