mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-09-17 21:35:21 +03:00
Initial commit - 611 cybersecurity skills across all subdomains
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: performing-adversary-in-the-middle-phishing-detection
|
||||
description: Detect and respond to Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing attacks that use reverse proxy kits like EvilProxy, Evilginx, and Tycoon 2FA to bypass MFA and steal session tokens.
|
||||
domain: cybersecurity
|
||||
subdomain: phishing-defense
|
||||
tags: [aitm, evilproxy, evilginx, phishing, mfa-bypass, session-hijacking, reverse-proxy, credential-theft]
|
||||
version: "1.0"
|
||||
author: mahipal
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Performing Adversary-in-the-Middle Phishing Detection
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing attacks use reverse-proxy infrastructure to sit between the victim and the legitimate authentication service, intercepting both credentials and session cookies in real time. This allows attackers to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA). The most prevalent PhaaS kits in 2025 include Tycoon 2FA, Sneaky 2FA, EvilProxy, and Evilginx. Over 1 million PhaaS attacks were detected in January-February 2025 alone. These attacks have evolved from QR codes to HTML attachments and SVG files for link distribution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prerequisites
|
||||
- Azure AD / Entra ID Conditional Access policies
|
||||
- SIEM with authentication log ingestion (Azure AD sign-in logs)
|
||||
- Web proxy with SSL inspection and URL categorization
|
||||
- Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution
|
||||
- FIDO2/phishing-resistant MFA capability
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
### How AiTM Works
|
||||
1. Victim receives phishing email with link to attacker-controlled domain
|
||||
2. Attacker domain runs reverse proxy that mirrors legitimate login page
|
||||
3. Victim enters credentials on proxied page; credentials captured in transit
|
||||
4. Reverse proxy forwards credentials to real authentication service
|
||||
5. MFA challenge sent to victim; victim completes MFA on proxied page
|
||||
6. Attacker captures session cookie returned by legitimate service
|
||||
7. Attacker replays session cookie to access victim's account without MFA
|
||||
|
||||
### Major AiTM Kits (2025)
|
||||
| Kit | Type | Primary Targets | Evasion |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Tycoon 2FA | PhaaS | Microsoft 365, Google | CAPTCHA, Cloudflare turnstile |
|
||||
| EvilProxy | PhaaS | Microsoft 365, Google, Okta | Random URLs, IP rotation |
|
||||
| Evilginx | Open-source | Any web application | Custom phishlets |
|
||||
| Sneaky 2FA | PhaaS | Microsoft 365 | Anti-bot checks |
|
||||
| NakedPages | PhaaS | Multiple | Minimal infrastructure |
|
||||
|
||||
### Detection Indicators
|
||||
- Authentication from unusual IP not matching user profile
|
||||
- Session cookie reuse from different IP/device than authentication
|
||||
- Login page served from non-Microsoft/non-Google infrastructure
|
||||
- CDN requests to legitimate auth providers from phishing domains
|
||||
- Impossible travel between authentication and session usage
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Deploy Phishing-Resistant MFA
|
||||
- Implement FIDO2 security keys or Windows Hello for Business for high-value accounts
|
||||
- Configure Conditional Access to require phishing-resistant MFA for admins
|
||||
- Enable certificate-based authentication where possible
|
||||
- Disable SMS and voice MFA for privileged accounts
|
||||
- AiTM cannot intercept FIDO2 because authentication is bound to origin domain
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Configure Conditional Access Policies
|
||||
- Require compliant/managed device for sensitive application access
|
||||
- Block authentication from anonymous proxies and Tor exit nodes
|
||||
- Enforce token binding to limit session cookie replay
|
||||
- Configure continuous access evaluation (CAE) for real-time token revocation
|
||||
- Implement sign-in risk policies that require re-authentication for risky sign-ins
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Build AiTM Detection Rules
|
||||
- Alert on sign-in followed by session from different IP within 10 minutes
|
||||
- Detect authentication where proxy IP does not match user's expected location
|
||||
- Monitor for impossible travel patterns in session usage
|
||||
- Alert on inbox rules created immediately after authentication (common post-compromise)
|
||||
- Detect new MFA method registration from suspicious sign-in
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Monitor Web Proxy for AiTM Infrastructure
|
||||
- Log and analyze DNS queries to newly registered domains
|
||||
- Detect connections to known PhaaS infrastructure IPs
|
||||
- Alert on authentication page backgrounds loaded from legitimate CDNs through proxy domains
|
||||
- Monitor for SSL certificates issued to domains mimicking corporate login pages
|
||||
- Block access to known EvilProxy/Evilginx infrastructure via threat intelligence
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Implement Post-Compromise Detection
|
||||
- Alert on mailbox forwarding rules created after suspicious authentication
|
||||
- Detect OAuth app consent after AiTM sign-in
|
||||
- Monitor for email sending patterns indicating BEC follow-up
|
||||
- Alert on SharePoint/OneDrive mass download after session hijack
|
||||
- Track lateral movement from compromised account
|
||||
|
||||
## Tools & Resources
|
||||
- **Microsoft Entra ID Protection**: Risk-based Conditional Access
|
||||
- **Azure AD Sign-in Logs**: Authentication event analysis
|
||||
- **Okta ThreatInsight**: AiTM proxy detection at IdP level
|
||||
- **Sekoia TDR**: AiTM campaign tracking and intelligence
|
||||
- **Evilginx (defensive)**: Understanding attack mechanics for detection
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation
|
||||
- Phishing-resistant MFA blocks AiTM session capture in test scenario
|
||||
- Conditional Access denies session replay from different device/IP
|
||||
- SIEM alerts fire on simulated AiTM sign-in patterns
|
||||
- Web proxy blocks connections to known PhaaS infrastructure
|
||||
- Post-compromise rules detect inbox rule creation after suspicious auth
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user