mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-08-02 00:57:42 +03:00
Initial commit - 611 cybersecurity skills across all subdomains
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
# Standards Reference - OT Network Security Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
## IEC 62443 (ISA/IEC 62443)
|
||||
|
||||
### IEC 62443-1-1: Terminology, Concepts, and Models
|
||||
- Defines foundational concepts including zones, conduits, security levels, and the IACS reference architecture
|
||||
- Establishes the vocabulary used across all parts of the standard
|
||||
|
||||
### IEC 62443-2-1: Security Management System Requirements
|
||||
- Requirements for an IACS security management system (SMS)
|
||||
- Covers risk assessment, security policies, organization, staff competence, and awareness
|
||||
|
||||
### IEC 62443-3-2: Security Risk Assessment for System Design
|
||||
- Defines the process for partitioning an IACS into zones and conduits
|
||||
- Establishes Security Level targets (SL-T) for each zone based on risk assessment
|
||||
- Zone characteristics: assets, access points, communication channels, data flows
|
||||
- Conduit characteristics: connected zones, protocols, security countermeasures
|
||||
|
||||
### IEC 62443-3-3: System Security Requirements and Security Levels
|
||||
- Foundational requirements (FR) mapped to security levels (SL 1-4):
|
||||
- FR 1: Identification and Authentication Control (IAC)
|
||||
- FR 2: Use Control (UC)
|
||||
- FR 3: System Integrity (SI)
|
||||
- FR 4: Data Confidentiality (DC)
|
||||
- FR 5: Restricted Data Flow (RDF)
|
||||
- FR 6: Timely Response to Events (TRE)
|
||||
- FR 7: Resource Availability (RA)
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Levels
|
||||
| Level | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| SL 1 | Protection against casual or coincidental violation |
|
||||
| SL 2 | Protection against intentional violation using simple means |
|
||||
| SL 3 | Protection against sophisticated attack with moderate resources |
|
||||
| SL 4 | Protection against state-sponsored attack with extensive resources |
|
||||
|
||||
## NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3
|
||||
|
||||
### Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security
|
||||
- Published September 2023, replacing the ICS-focused Rev. 2
|
||||
- Expanded scope covers: ICS/SCADA, building automation, transportation, physical access control, physical environment monitoring
|
||||
- Provides OT overlay for NIST SP 800-53r5 security controls
|
||||
- Tailored security control baselines for low/moderate/high-impact OT systems
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Sections for Network Assessment
|
||||
- Section 3: OT Overview and Architectures (Purdue Model reference)
|
||||
- Section 4: OT Risk Management
|
||||
- Section 5: OT Security Architecture (network segmentation, DMZ design)
|
||||
- Section 6: Applying Security Controls to OT (overlay guidance)
|
||||
|
||||
### OT-Specific Control Tailoring
|
||||
- AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement): Implement data diodes for unidirectional flows from Level 3 to Level 3.5
|
||||
- SC-7 (Boundary Protection): Industrial firewalls with protocol-aware deep packet inspection
|
||||
- AU-6 (Audit Record Review): Correlate OT network events with process alarms
|
||||
|
||||
## NERC CIP Standards (Power Sector)
|
||||
|
||||
### CIP-002-5.1a: BES Cyber System Categorization
|
||||
- Identify and categorize Bulk Electric System (BES) cyber systems as high, medium, or low impact
|
||||
|
||||
### CIP-005-7: Electronic Security Perimeters
|
||||
- Define Electronic Security Perimeters (ESP) around BES cyber systems
|
||||
- Require Electronic Access Points (EAP) at all ESP boundaries
|
||||
- 2025 update requires MFA for remote access to medium and high-impact systems
|
||||
|
||||
### CIP-007-6: System Security Management
|
||||
- Port and service management, security patch management
|
||||
- Malicious code prevention, security event monitoring
|
||||
- System access controls and authentication
|
||||
|
||||
### CIP-010-4: Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
|
||||
- Baseline configurations for BES cyber systems
|
||||
- Transient cyber asset and removable media management
|
||||
- Active vulnerability assessments at least every 15 months
|
||||
|
||||
## Purdue Reference Model (ISA-95)
|
||||
|
||||
### Level Architecture
|
||||
| Level | Name | Examples |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|
|
||||
| Level 0 | Physical Process | Sensors, actuators, analyzers |
|
||||
| Level 1 | Basic Control | PLCs, RTUs, safety controllers |
|
||||
| Level 2 | Area Supervisory Control | HMI, engineering workstations, local historian |
|
||||
| Level 3 | Site Operations | OPC servers, site historian, MES |
|
||||
| Level 3.5 | DMZ | Data diodes, jump servers, patch servers |
|
||||
| Level 4 | Enterprise | ERP, email, corporate IT |
|
||||
| Level 5 | Internet/Cloud | Remote access, cloud services |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
||||
# Workflows - OT Network Security Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
## Assessment Lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Scoping Phase 2: Discovery Phase 3: Analysis
|
||||
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
|
||||
| Define scope | | Passive capture | | Protocol review |
|
||||
| Safety limits | ----> | Asset inventory | ---> | Zone evaluation |
|
||||
| Authorization | | Traffic mapping | | Firewall audit |
|
||||
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 6: Verify Phase 5: Remediate Phase 4: Report
|
||||
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
|
||||
| Validate fixes | | Segmentation | | Risk scoring |
|
||||
| Re-assessment | <---- | FW rule changes | <--- | Finding detail |
|
||||
| Compliance map | | Protocol harden | | Prioritization |
|
||||
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Scoping and Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
### Inputs
|
||||
- Facility type and industry vertical
|
||||
- Regulatory requirements (NERC CIP, IEC 62443, NIST CSF)
|
||||
- Existing network diagrams and asset inventories
|
||||
- Maintenance window schedules
|
||||
|
||||
### Activities
|
||||
1. Meet with operations, engineering, and IT security teams
|
||||
2. Define Purdue levels in scope and safety-critical exclusions
|
||||
3. Obtain written authorization specifying permitted assessment activities
|
||||
4. Identify SPAN/TAP points for passive monitoring deployment
|
||||
5. Review prior assessment reports and known issues
|
||||
|
||||
### Outputs
|
||||
- Signed Rules of Engagement document
|
||||
- Assessment scope matrix (Purdue levels vs. activity types)
|
||||
- SPAN/TAP deployment plan
|
||||
- Emergency contact list and escalation procedures
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Passive Network Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
### Inputs
|
||||
- SPAN port access on OT network switches
|
||||
- Assessment scope document
|
||||
|
||||
### Activities
|
||||
1. Deploy passive monitoring sensors on SPAN ports at each Purdue level boundary
|
||||
2. Capture network traffic for minimum 2 weeks to observe full operational cycle
|
||||
3. Build asset inventory from observed traffic (MAC, IP, protocols, firmware versions)
|
||||
4. Map all communication flows with source, destination, protocol, and frequency
|
||||
5. Identify industrial protocols in use (Modbus, DNP3, OPC UA, EtherNet/IP, S7comm)
|
||||
6. Detect unauthorized devices and rogue connections
|
||||
|
||||
### Activities - Wireless Assessment
|
||||
1. Scan for wireless access points in OT areas using spectrum analyzer
|
||||
2. Identify wireless industrial protocols (WirelessHART, ISA100.11a, Zigbee)
|
||||
3. Check for unauthorized Wi-Fi networks bridging IT and OT
|
||||
|
||||
### Outputs
|
||||
- Complete asset inventory with Purdue level classification
|
||||
- Network communication flow map
|
||||
- Protocol distribution analysis
|
||||
- Unauthorized device/connection list
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Analysis and Evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
### Inputs
|
||||
- Asset inventory and traffic capture data
|
||||
- Firewall rule exports
|
||||
- Network architecture diagrams
|
||||
|
||||
### Activities
|
||||
1. Evaluate zone architecture against IEC 62443-3-2 requirements
|
||||
2. Analyze firewall rules for overly permissive or prohibited conduits
|
||||
3. Assess industrial protocol security (authentication, encryption, access controls)
|
||||
4. Review remote access architecture and authentication mechanisms
|
||||
5. Evaluate patch levels of HMI, engineering workstations, and servers
|
||||
6. Check for known vulnerabilities in discovered OT firmware versions
|
||||
7. Assess physical security of network equipment in field locations
|
||||
|
||||
### Outputs
|
||||
- Finding list with severity ratings
|
||||
- Gap analysis against applicable standards
|
||||
- Risk matrix mapping findings to operational/safety impact
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
### Report Structure
|
||||
1. Executive Summary (1 page)
|
||||
2. Scope and Methodology
|
||||
3. Asset Inventory Summary
|
||||
4. Network Architecture Assessment
|
||||
5. Detailed Findings (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
6. Compliance Gap Analysis
|
||||
7. Remediation Roadmap with Prioritization
|
||||
8. Appendices (asset inventory, network diagrams, tool output)
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Remediation Support
|
||||
|
||||
### Priority Order
|
||||
1. **Immediate**: Block unauthorized cross-zone paths (enterprise to field devices)
|
||||
2. **30-day**: Implement DMZ between corporate IT and OT operations
|
||||
3. **60-day**: Deploy industrial protocol-aware firewalls between zones
|
||||
4. **90-day**: Harden remote access with MFA and jump servers
|
||||
5. **6-month**: Full zone/conduit segmentation per IEC 62443 design
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Scoring for OT Environments
|
||||
|
||||
OT risk scoring must account for safety impact beyond traditional CIA triad:
|
||||
|
||||
| Factor | Weight | Description |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| Safety Impact | 30% | Potential for physical harm to personnel or public |
|
||||
| Operational Impact | 25% | Production disruption or equipment damage |
|
||||
| Environmental Impact | 15% | Release of hazardous materials |
|
||||
| Financial Impact | 15% | Direct costs and regulatory penalties |
|
||||
| Reputational Impact | 15% | Public trust and regulatory scrutiny |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user