Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/migrating-to-post-quantum-cryptography/SKILL.md

name, description, domain, subdomain, tags, version, author, license, nist_csf, mitre_attack

name	description	domain	subdomain	tags	version	author	license	nist_csf	mitre_attack
migrating-to-post-quantum-cryptography	Inventory cryptography, deploy hybrid X25519 and ML-KEM, and prioritize harvest-now-decrypt-later data.	cybersecurity	cryptography	post-quantum cryptography ml-kem ml-dsa crypto-agility cbom tls quantum-readiness	1.0	mahipal	Apache-2.0	PR.DS-02	T1573

Migrating to Post-Quantum Cryptography

Scope and Authorization: This skill describes defensive cryptographic-migration engineering on systems you own or operate. Cryptographic discovery scanning can touch sensitive key material and production traffic — run inventory tooling only with authorization and in line with your organization's change-management and data-handling policies.

Overview

A cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) running Shor's algorithm will break the public-key cryptography that secures almost all of today's communications and signatures: RSA, finite-field and elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (DH/ECDH), and ECDSA. Symmetric primitives (AES) and hashes (SHA-2/3) are only weakened (Grover gives a quadratic speedup, mitigated by larger key/output sizes), but asymmetric algorithms are catastrophically broken. The most urgent threat is harvest-now, decrypt-later (HNDL): adversaries capturing encrypted traffic today to decrypt once a CRQC exists, which puts long-lived secrets (health records, state secrets, intellectual property, root-of-trust keys) at risk now.

On 13 August 2024 NIST finalized the first post-quantum standards: FIPS 203 (ML-KEM, Module-Lattice KEM, formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber) for key establishment, FIPS 204 (ML-DSA, Module-Lattice digital signatures, formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium), and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA, the stateless hash-based signature scheme SPHINCS+). The migration playbook (NIST SP 1800-38, Migration to Post-Quantum Cryptography) is: (1) build a cryptographic inventory / CBOM, (2) prioritize by HNDL exposure and crypto-agility, (3) deploy hybrid schemes (a classical algorithm AND a PQC algorithm combined, e.g. X25519MLKEM768) so a break in either leg does not compromise the session, and (4) re-key and rotate.

This skill maps to ATT&CK T1573 – Encrypted Channel: the same cryptographic channels adversaries abuse for stealthy C2 are the channels defenders must make quantum-resistant; understanding the algorithms in use is foundational to both attack detection and defensive migration. The NIST CSF outcome is PR.DS-02 (data-in-transit protection) — and by extension data-at-rest for HNDL-sensitive stores.

When to Use

• When building an enterprise cryptographic inventory / Cryptography Bill of Materials (CBOM) for quantum-readiness.
• When prioritizing which systems must migrate first based on data lifetime and HNDL exposure.
• When enabling hybrid post-quantum key exchange (X25519MLKEM768) on TLS endpoints, VPNs, or SSH.
• When issuing PQC or hybrid certificates and testing PQC signature verification.
• When evaluating crypto-agility — the ability to swap algorithms without re-architecting applications.

Prerequisites

• OpenSSL 3.5.0 or later, which ships native ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SLH-DSA support:

  openssl version            # expect 3.5.0+
  openssl list -kem-algorithms | grep -i mlkem
  openssl list -signature-algorithms | grep -i mldsa
  

• For OpenSSL 3.0–3.4, the Open Quantum Safe oqs-provider plus liboqs:

  git clone https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs && \
    cmake -S liboqs -B liboqs/build && cmake --build liboqs/build && \
    sudo cmake --install liboqs/build
  git clone https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider && \
    cmake -S oqs-provider -B oqs-provider/_build && \
    cmake --build oqs-provider/_build && \
    sudo cmake --install oqs-provider/_build
  

• Python 3.8+ for the inventory helper:

  python3 -m pip install cryptography
  

• (Optional) A CBOM generator: CycloneDX cdxgen, or cbomkit-theia for container/directory crypto discovery.

Objectives

• Produce a cryptographic inventory (CBOM) of algorithms, key sizes, certificates, and protocols in use.
• Classify assets by quantum vulnerability and HNDL exposure and prioritize migration.
• Stand up and verify hybrid X25519MLKEM768 key exchange on a TLS endpoint.
• Generate ML-KEM and ML-DSA keys and a PQC/hybrid certificate, and verify signatures.
• Establish a crypto-agility baseline and a re-keying / rotation plan.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

ID	Official Technique Name	Relevance
T1573	Encrypted Channel	Migration secures the encrypted channels (TLS/VPN/SSH) that protect data in transit; cryptographic inventory of these channels also underpins detection of adversary-controlled encrypted C2.
T1573.002	Encrypted Channel: Asymmetric Cryptography	RSA/ECDH key exchange — the exact asymmetric primitives broken by a CRQC and replaced by ML-KEM hybrids.
T1573.001	Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography	AES and other symmetric ciphers; quantum-weakened by Grover, mitigated by 256-bit keys rather than replacement.

Workflow

1. Confirm PQC algorithm availability

openssl version
# List quantum-safe KEMs and signatures available in this OpenSSL build
openssl list -kem-algorithms | grep -Ei 'mlkem|kyber'
openssl list -signature-algorithms | grep -Ei 'mldsa|dilithium|slhdsa|sphincs'
openssl list -tls-groups 2>/dev/null | grep -Ei 'mlkem'

If using oqs-provider on OpenSSL 3.0–3.4, activate it in openssl.cnf:

[provider_sect]
default = default_sect
oqsprovider = oqsprovider_sect
[default_sect]
activate = 1
[oqsprovider_sect]
activate = 1

2. Build a cryptographic inventory (CBOM)

Generate a CycloneDX CBOM from a code repo or container with cbomkit-theia / cdxgen:

# Directory / container image crypto discovery
cbomkit-theia dir ./myapp --output cbom.json
# or with cdxgen (Java keystores, certs, source-level algorithms)
cdxgen -t java --include-crypto -o cbom.json ./myapp

Enumerate TLS algorithms and certificate signature schemes across live endpoints with the helper agent.py scan (below), and the public-key strength of any certificate:

openssl x509 -in server.crt -noout -text | grep -E 'Signature Algorithm|Public Key'

3. Classify and prioritize by HNDL exposure

For each inventoried asset, record: algorithm, key size, where the key lives, data sensitivity, and data lifetime. Prioritize migration where data_lifetime_years + migration_time > years_until_CRQC (Mosca's inequality). Long-lived confidential data over public networks ranks highest; ephemeral internal traffic ranks lower. Hash-based signature roots-of-trust (firmware signing) are also high priority because they protect long-lived trust anchors.

4. Generate ML-KEM and ML-DSA key material

# ML-KEM-768 (key establishment) keypair
openssl genpkey -algorithm ML-KEM-768 -out mlkem768.key
# OpenSSL 3.0-3.4 + oqs-provider uses lowercase 'mlkem768'
# openssl genpkey -algorithm mlkem768 -out mlkem768.key

# ML-DSA-65 (signature) keypair
openssl genpkey -algorithm ML-DSA-65 -out mldsa65.key
openssl pkey -in mldsa65.key -pubout -out mldsa65.pub

5. Issue a PQC (ML-DSA) certificate

# Self-signed ML-DSA-65 certificate for testing
openssl req -new -x509 -key mldsa65.key -out mldsa65.crt -days 365 \
  -subj "/CN=pqc-test.example.com"
openssl x509 -in mldsa65.crt -noout -text | grep -A1 'Signature Algorithm'

6. Sign and verify with ML-DSA

echo "firmware-image-v2.bin" > artifact.txt
openssl dgst -sign mldsa65.key -out artifact.sig artifact.txt
openssl dgst -verify mldsa65.pub -signature artifact.sig artifact.txt
# -> "Verified OK"

7. Deploy and test hybrid TLS key exchange

Run a TLS 1.3 server and force the hybrid group X25519MLKEM768 (classical X25519 + ML-KEM-768):

# Server (use a classical or ML-DSA cert/key)
openssl s_server -accept 4433 -www -tls1_3 \
  -cert mldsa65.crt -key mldsa65.key -groups X25519MLKEM768

# Client — negotiate the hybrid group and confirm it was used
openssl s_client -connect localhost:4433 -tls1_3 -groups X25519MLKEM768 \
  </dev/null 2>/dev/null | grep -E 'Negotiated|Server Temp Key|Cipher'

For external endpoints, confirm support against a public PQC test server:

openssl s_client -groups X25519MLKEM768 -tls1_3 -connect pq.cloudflareresearch.com:443 </dev/null

8. Enable hybrid PQC on production TLS terminators

Configure the web server / load balancer to offer the hybrid group while keeping classical fallback for old clients. NGINX with OpenSSL 3.5+:

server {
    listen 443 ssl;
    ssl_protocols TLSv1.3;
    ssl_ecdh_curve X25519MLKEM768:X25519:secp256r1;   # hybrid first, classical fallback
    ssl_certificate     /etc/nginx/certs/server.crt;
    ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/certs/server.key;
}

Reload and verify with the s_client command from step 7 against the live host.

9. Establish crypto-agility and a rotation plan

Centralize algorithm selection (config, not code), record key/cert expiry, and schedule re-keying. Re-run the inventory (step 2) on a cadence to confirm no quantum-vulnerable-only algorithms remain on prioritized assets, and track residual RSA/ECDH usage to zero on high-HNDL paths.

Tools and Resources

Tool / Resource	Purpose	Link
FIPS 203 (ML-KEM)	KEM standard	https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final
FIPS 204 (ML-DSA)	Signature standard	https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final
FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)	Hash-based signature standard	https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final
NIST SP 1800-38	Migration practice guide / crypto discovery	https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/crypto-agility-considerations-migrating-post-quantum-cryptographic-algorithms
OpenSSL 3.5	Native ML-KEM/ML-DSA/SLH-DSA + hybrid groups	https://www.openssl.org
oqs-provider / liboqs	PQC for OpenSSL 3.0–3.4	https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider
CycloneDX CBOM	Cryptography Bill of Materials spec	https://cyclonedx.org/capabilities/cbom/
CBOMkit / cbomkit-theia	Crypto discovery & CBOM generation	https://github.com/cbomkit/cbomkit-theia

Algorithm Reference

Classical (broken/weakened)	Quantum-safe replacement	Standard	Use
RSA / ECDH / DH key exchange	ML-KEM-512/768/1024 (hybrid: X25519MLKEM768)	FIPS 203	Key establishment
RSA / ECDSA / EdDSA signatures	ML-DSA-44/65/87	FIPS 204	General signatures
(backup signature)	SLH-DSA (SPHINCS+)	FIPS 205	Conservative/firmware signing
AES-128	AES-256	FIPS 197	Symmetric (Grover-hardened)
SHA-256	SHA-384/512, SHA-3	FIPS 180-4/202	Hashing

Validation Criteria

• OpenSSL 3.5+ (or 3.x + oqs-provider) confirmed exposing ML-KEM and ML-DSA.
• Cryptographic inventory / CBOM produced covering algorithms, keys, certs, and protocols.
• Assets classified and prioritized by HNDL exposure (Mosca's inequality applied).
• ML-KEM-768 and ML-DSA-65 keypairs generated successfully.
• PQC (ML-DSA) certificate issued and its signature algorithm verified.
• Sign/verify round trip with ML-DSA returns "Verified OK".
• Hybrid X25519MLKEM768 key exchange negotiated and confirmed on a test endpoint.
• Production TLS terminator offers the hybrid group with classical fallback.
• Crypto-agility/rotation plan documented and inventory re-run scheduled.