Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/hunting-for-scheduled-task-persistence/SKILL.md

name, description, domain, subdomain, tags, version, author, license, d3fend_techniques, nist_csf, mitre_attack

name	description	domain	subdomain	tags	version	author	license	d3fend_techniques	nist_csf	mitre_attack
hunting-for-scheduled-task-persistence	Runs a hypothesis-driven threat hunt for Windows Scheduled Task persistence (T1053), guiding SIEM/EDR queries against task creation events (e.g. Event ID 4698), suspicious task actions, and unusual scheduling patterns. Use when hunting for scheduled-task persistence, after threat intel flags related campaigns, during incident response, or when alerts fire on schtasks/at.exe activity.	cybersecurity	threat-hunting	threat-hunting mitre-attack scheduled-tasks persistence t1053 proactive-detection	1.0	mahipal	Apache-2.0	Execution Isolation Process Termination Hardware-based Process Isolation Platform Monitoring Process Suspension	DE.CM-01 DE.AE-02 DE.AE-07 ID.RA-05	T1046 T1057 T1082 T1083 T1547

Hunting For Scheduled Task Persistence

When to Use

• When proactively hunting for indicators of hunting for scheduled task persistence in the environment
• After threat intelligence indicates active campaigns using these techniques
• During incident response to scope compromise related to these techniques
• When EDR or SIEM alerts trigger on related indicators
• During periodic security assessments and purple team exercises

Prerequisites

• EDR platform with process and network telemetry (CrowdStrike, MDE, SentinelOne)
• SIEM with relevant log data ingested (Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel)
• Sysmon deployed with comprehensive configuration
• Windows Security Event Log forwarding enabled
• Threat intelligence feeds for IOC correlation

Workflow

1. Formulate Hypothesis: Define a testable hypothesis based on threat intelligence or ATT&CK gap analysis.
2. Identify Data Sources: Determine which logs and telemetry are needed to validate or refute the hypothesis.
3. Execute Queries: Run detection queries against SIEM and EDR platforms to collect relevant events.
4. Analyze Results: Examine query results for anomalies, correlating across multiple data sources.
5. Validate Findings: Distinguish true positives from false positives through contextual analysis.
6. Correlate Activity: Link findings to broader attack chains and threat actor TTPs.
7. Document and Report: Record findings, update detection rules, and recommend response actions.

Key Concepts

Concept	Description
T1053.005	Scheduled Task
T1053.003	Cron
T1053.002	At

Tools & Systems

Tool	Purpose
CrowdStrike Falcon	EDR telemetry and threat detection
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	Advanced hunting with KQL
Splunk Enterprise	SIEM log analysis with SPL queries
Elastic Security	Detection rules and investigation timeline
Sysmon	Detailed Windows event monitoring
Velociraptor	Endpoint artifact collection and hunting
Sigma Rules	Cross-platform detection rule format

Common Scenarios

1. Scenario 1: Cobalt Strike persistence via schtasks creating periodic beacon
2. Scenario 2: Ransomware scheduled task for re-execution after reboot
3. Scenario 3: APT encoded PowerShell task running every 30 minutes
4. Scenario 4: Insider task to periodically copy sensitive files

Output Format

Hunt ID: TH-HUNTIN-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Technique: T1053.005
Host: [Hostname]
User: [Account context]
Evidence: [Log entries, process trees, network data]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
Recommended Action: [Containment, investigation, monitoring]