mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-06-12 06:04:56 +03:00
4.7 KiB
4.7 KiB
Workflows - OT Network Security Assessment
Assessment Lifecycle
Phase 1: Scoping Phase 2: Discovery Phase 3: Analysis
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
| Define scope | | Passive capture | | Protocol review |
| Safety limits | ----> | Asset inventory | ---> | Zone evaluation |
| Authorization | | Traffic mapping | | Firewall audit |
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
|
Phase 6: Verify Phase 5: Remediate Phase 4: Report
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
| Validate fixes | | Segmentation | | Risk scoring |
| Re-assessment | <---- | FW rule changes | <--- | Finding detail |
| Compliance map | | Protocol harden | | Prioritization |
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
Phase 1: Scoping and Authorization
Inputs
- Facility type and industry vertical
- Regulatory requirements (NERC CIP, IEC 62443, NIST CSF)
- Existing network diagrams and asset inventories
- Maintenance window schedules
Activities
- Meet with operations, engineering, and IT security teams
- Define Purdue levels in scope and safety-critical exclusions
- Obtain written authorization specifying permitted assessment activities
- Identify SPAN/TAP points for passive monitoring deployment
- Review prior assessment reports and known issues
Outputs
- Signed Rules of Engagement document
- Assessment scope matrix (Purdue levels vs. activity types)
- SPAN/TAP deployment plan
- Emergency contact list and escalation procedures
Phase 2: Passive Network Discovery
Inputs
- SPAN port access on OT network switches
- Assessment scope document
Activities
- Deploy passive monitoring sensors on SPAN ports at each Purdue level boundary
- Capture network traffic for minimum 2 weeks to observe full operational cycle
- Build asset inventory from observed traffic (MAC, IP, protocols, firmware versions)
- Map all communication flows with source, destination, protocol, and frequency
- Identify industrial protocols in use (Modbus, DNP3, OPC UA, EtherNet/IP, S7comm)
- Detect unauthorized devices and rogue connections
Activities - Wireless Assessment
- Scan for wireless access points in OT areas using spectrum analyzer
- Identify wireless industrial protocols (WirelessHART, ISA100.11a, Zigbee)
- Check for unauthorized Wi-Fi networks bridging IT and OT
Outputs
- Complete asset inventory with Purdue level classification
- Network communication flow map
- Protocol distribution analysis
- Unauthorized device/connection list
Phase 3: Analysis and Evaluation
Inputs
- Asset inventory and traffic capture data
- Firewall rule exports
- Network architecture diagrams
Activities
- Evaluate zone architecture against IEC 62443-3-2 requirements
- Analyze firewall rules for overly permissive or prohibited conduits
- Assess industrial protocol security (authentication, encryption, access controls)
- Review remote access architecture and authentication mechanisms
- Evaluate patch levels of HMI, engineering workstations, and servers
- Check for known vulnerabilities in discovered OT firmware versions
- Assess physical security of network equipment in field locations
Outputs
- Finding list with severity ratings
- Gap analysis against applicable standards
- Risk matrix mapping findings to operational/safety impact
Phase 4: Reporting
Report Structure
- Executive Summary (1 page)
- Scope and Methodology
- Asset Inventory Summary
- Network Architecture Assessment
- Detailed Findings (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Compliance Gap Analysis
- Remediation Roadmap with Prioritization
- Appendices (asset inventory, network diagrams, tool output)
Phase 5: Remediation Support
Priority Order
- Immediate: Block unauthorized cross-zone paths (enterprise to field devices)
- 30-day: Implement DMZ between corporate IT and OT operations
- 60-day: Deploy industrial protocol-aware firewalls between zones
- 90-day: Harden remote access with MFA and jump servers
- 6-month: Full zone/conduit segmentation per IEC 62443 design
Risk Scoring for OT Environments
OT risk scoring must account for safety impact beyond traditional CIA triad:
| Factor | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Impact | 30% | Potential for physical harm to personnel or public |
| Operational Impact | 25% | Production disruption or equipment damage |
| Environmental Impact | 15% | Release of hazardous materials |
| Financial Impact | 15% | Direct costs and regulatory penalties |
| Reputational Impact | 15% | Public trust and regulatory scrutiny |