mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-07-24 13:40:57 +03:00
- conducting-cyber-risk-assessment-with-nist-800-30 - executing-nist-rmf-authorization-to-operate - achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance - implementing-hipaa-security-rule-safeguards - managing-third-party-vendor-risk Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.5 KiB
5.5 KiB
HIPAA Security Rule — Standards & Reference
Primary regulation
HIPAA Security Rule — 45 CFR Part 164, Subpart C
- Regulator: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
- Scope: Security of electronic protected health information (ePHI) held or transmitted by covered entities and business associates.
- Statutory basis: HIPAA (1996) as amended by HITECH (2009).
- eCFR: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-164/subpart-C
Rule structure (key sections)
| Section | Title |
|---|---|
| §164.302 | Applicability |
| §164.304 | Definitions |
| §164.306 | Security standards: general rules (flexibility, scalability) |
| §164.308 | Administrative safeguards |
| §164.310 | Physical safeguards |
| §164.312 | Technical safeguards |
| §164.314 | Organizational requirements (BAAs, group health plans) |
| §164.316 | Policies, procedures, and documentation (6-year retention) |
Breach Notification Rule: 45 CFR §§164.400–414 (Subpart D).
Administrative safeguards (§164.308) — standards
- Security Management Process — Risk Analysis (R), Risk Management (R), Sanction Policy (R), Information System Activity Review (R)
- Assigned Security Responsibility (named Security Official)
- Workforce Security (authorization/supervision, clearance, termination — Addressable)
- Information Access Management (isolating clearinghouse functions (R); access authorization/establishment/modification — Addressable)
- Security Awareness and Training (reminders, malware protection, log-in monitoring, password management — Addressable)
- Security Incident Procedures — Response and Reporting (R)
- Contingency Plan — Data Backup Plan (R), Disaster Recovery Plan (R), Emergency Mode Operation Plan (R), Testing/Revision (A), Applications/Data Criticality Analysis (A)
- Evaluation (periodic)
- Business Associate Contracts (§164.308(b))
Physical safeguards (§164.310) — standards
- Facility Access Controls (contingency operations, facility security plan, access control/validation, maintenance records — all Addressable)
- Workstation Use (R)
- Workstation Security (R)
- Device and Media Controls — Disposal (R), Media Re-use (R), Accountability (A), Data Backup and Storage (A)
Technical safeguards (§164.312) — standards
- Access Control — Unique User Identification (R), Emergency Access Procedure (R), Automatic Logoff (A), Encryption and Decryption (A)
- Audit Controls (R)
- Integrity — Mechanism to Authenticate ePHI (A)
- Person or Entity Authentication (R)
- Transmission Security — Integrity Controls (A), Encryption (A)
(R) = Required, (A) = Addressable, under the current rule.
Required vs Addressable
- Required: must be implemented as specified.
- Addressable: assess whether the specification is reasonable and appropriate; if yes, implement; if no, document why and implement an equivalent alternative measure if reasonable. Addressable is not optional.
Breach Notification (45 CFR §§164.400–414)
- Applies to breaches of unsecured PHI.
- Four-factor risk assessment to determine whether a breach occurred (nature/extent of PHI, who used/received it, whether it was actually acquired/viewed, mitigation).
- Notify individuals without unreasonable delay and within 60 days; notify HHS (annually for <500; without unreasonable delay and within 60 days for 500+); notify media for breaches affecting 500+ residents of a state/jurisdiction.
- Safe harbor: PHI encrypted to HHS/NIST-specified standards is "secured" and not subject to breach notification.
2025 NPRM — PROPOSED changes (NOT yet final)
- Citation: 90 FR 800, RIN 0945-AA22, published January 6, 2025; comment period closed March 7, 2025.
- Status: Proposed only. The current Security Rule remains in force until a final rule is published and becomes effective. Track at https://www.federalregister.gov.
- Notable proposals:
- Remove the required/addressable distinction — make (nearly) all implementation specifications required.
- Mandatory multi-factor authentication.
- Mandatory encryption of ePHI at rest and in transit.
- Asset inventory and network maps, updated regularly.
- Vulnerability scans at least every 6 months and penetration testing at least annually.
- 72-hour restoration of certain systems/data after an incident.
- Annual risk-analysis updates and written documentation of compliance reviews.
- Typical effective/compliance timing if finalized: effective ~60 days after publication; compliance ~180 days after effective (subject to the final rule).
Supporting NIST guidance
| Document | Role |
|---|---|
| NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 (2024) | Implementing the HIPAA Security Rule; maps safeguards to SP 800-53 controls. |
| NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 | Risk-assessment methodology underpinning the required risk analysis. |
| HHS SRA Tool | Free guided Security Risk Assessment for smaller organizations. |
NIST CSF 2.0 alignment
| CSF 2.0 ID | Relevance |
|---|---|
| GV.OC-03 | Legal/regulatory (HIPAA) requirements understood. |
| GV.RM-01 | Risk-management objectives established. |
| ID.RA-01 / ID.RA-05 | Vulnerabilities identified; risk informs prioritization (the risk analysis). |
| PR.DS-01 | Data-at-rest protection (encryption of ePHI). |
| PR.AA-01 | Identity/authentication (unique IDs, MFA). |
| DE.CM-01 | Monitoring (audit controls, activity review). |