mirror of
https://github.com/duthaho/claudekit.git
synced 2026-07-22 20:51:01 +03:00
feat: explicit effort-tier model across the design-phase spine
Add a Trivial/Small/Standard tier model so the design ceremony scales to the change while the evidence gate never does. README gains a canonical 'Sizing the work' table + the non-negotiable rule (verification-gate and code-review-loop always run); shape-spec gets a Step 0 sizing gate; write-plan and plan-review state which tier they belong to.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -35,12 +35,20 @@ before code or `plan-review`.
|
||||
|
||||
## When NOT to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- The change is single-file and you'll finish it in 30 minutes
|
||||
- The change is **Trivial** (one-line / single-file / describable in one sentence) — skip planning, make the change, run `verification-gate`
|
||||
- A plan exists; you should be running `plan-review` against it, not rewriting it
|
||||
- You don't have a spec yet — go to `shape-spec` first
|
||||
- You don't have a spec yet and the change is **Standard** — go to `shape-spec` first
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
**Effort tier:** planning is for **Small** and **Standard** changes. A **Small**
|
||||
change (≤ ~3 files, obvious design) needs only a lightweight inline plan — the
|
||||
task list and per-task acceptance check below, skipping the spec that fed it. A
|
||||
**Standard** change gets the full plan and then `plan-review`. **Trivial** changes
|
||||
skip this skill entirely. Either way `verification-gate` and `code-review-loop`
|
||||
still run — planning scales, the gate does not. (Full tier table: README "Sizing
|
||||
the work".)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Confirm the spec is sufficient
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Avoid planning against a spec that itself is incomplete.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user