creator/claudekit
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/duthaho/claudekit.git synced 2026-07-23 05:01:00 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: align Small-tier plan-review rule and changelog wording

Browse Source 
Resolve two consistency nits from review: shape-spec said plan-review was
'optional' for Small while the README canonical table says skip it (align
to skip); and the changelog now describes both misuse directions the new
rationalizations guard against, not just gate-skipping.
This commit is contained in:
duthaho
2026-07-22 05:00:06 +00:00
parent 81c94aee91
commit bc6418761d
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/shape-spec/SKILL.md
+2 -3
View File
@@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ change is how the missing constraint ships.
- **Trivial** — one-line / single-file / describable in one sentence. **Stop
here — no spec.** Make the change, then go straight to `verification-gate`
and `code-review-loop`.
- **Small** — one focused change, ≤ ~3 files, design obvious. **Skip the spec**
and hand off to `write-plan` for a lightweight inline plan; `plan-review` is
optional at this tier.
- **Small** — one focused change, ≤ ~3 files, design obvious. **Skip the spec
and plan-review**; hand off to `write-plan` for a lightweight inline plan.
- **Standard** — multi-file, multi-session, or real design decisions. Continue
to Step 1 and write the full spec.
2. Whatever the tier, the evidence never scales to zero: `verification-gate` runs