feat: improved the Claude Kit as a plugin

This commit is contained in:
duthaho
2026-04-19 14:10:38 +07:00
parent 3103a8da1b
commit d1a6d2a2bc
186 changed files with 771 additions and 1691 deletions
+363
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
---
name: writing-plans
argument-hint: "[task description]"
description: >
Use when a multi-step implementation task needs to be broken down before coding begins. Activate for keywords like "plan", "break down", "implementation steps", "task list", "how to implement", "write a plan", or when a feature spans multiple files or components. Also trigger when handing off work to another developer, when the user says "let's plan this out", or when a task is complex enough that jumping straight to code would be risky. If in doubt, plan first.
---
# Writing Plans
## When to Use
- After brainstorming/design is complete
- Before starting implementation
- When handing off work to another developer
- For complex features requiring structured approach
## When NOT to Use
- Single-file changes where the path forward is obvious
- Already has a plan to execute -- use `executing-plans` instead
- Exploration or research tasks where the goal is learning, not building
---
## Plan Document Format
### Header Section
```markdown
# Plan: [Feature Name]
**Required Skill**: executing-plans
## Goal
[One sentence describing what will be built]
## Architecture Overview
[2-3 sentences describing the approach]
## Tech Stack
- [Technology 1]
- [Technology 2]
```
### Task Structure (TypeScript)
Each numbered task contains:
```markdown
## Task [N]: [Task Name]
**Files**:
- Create: `path/to/new-file.ts`
- Modify: `path/to/existing-file.ts`
- Test: `path/to/test-file.test.ts`
**Steps**:
1. Write failing test
```typescript
// Exact test code
```
2. Verify test fails
```bash
npm test -- --grep "test name"
# Expected: 1 failing
```
3. Implement minimally
```typescript
// Exact implementation code
```
4. Verify test passes
```bash
npm test -- --grep "test name"
# Expected: 1 passing
```
5. Commit
```bash
git add .
git commit -m "feat: add [feature]"
```
```
### Task Structure (Python / FastAPI)
```markdown
## Task [N]: [Task Name]
**Files**:
- Create: `src/api/orders.py`
- Create: `src/schemas/order.py`
- Test: `tests/test_orders.py`
**Steps**:
1. Write failing test
```python
import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient
@pytest.mark.anyio
async def test_create_order_returns_201(client: AsyncClient):
response = await client.post("/api/orders", json={"item": "widget", "quantity": 2})
assert response.status_code == 201
assert response.json()["item"] == "widget"
```
2. Verify test fails
```bash
pytest tests/test_orders.py -v
# Expected: FAILED — 404 (route doesn't exist)
```
3. Implement minimally
```python
from fastapi import APIRouter, status
from pydantic import BaseModel
router = APIRouter(prefix="/api/orders")
class CreateOrderRequest(BaseModel):
item: str
quantity: int
@router.post("", status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def create_order(body: CreateOrderRequest):
return {"id": "ord_1", "item": body.item, "quantity": body.quantity}
```
4. Verify test passes
```bash
pytest tests/test_orders.py -v
# Expected: 1 passed
```
5. Commit
```bash
git add .
git commit -m "feat: add create order endpoint"
```
```
---
## Task Granularity
### Bite-Sized Principle
Each task should be **2-5 minutes** of focused work:
- Write one test
- Implement one function
- Add one validation
### Why Small Tasks?
- Easier to verify correctness
- Natural commit points
- Reduces context switching
- Enables parallel work
- Clearer progress tracking
### Bad vs Good Task Breakdown
```
BAD: "Implement user authentication"
GOOD:
- Task 1: Create User model with email field
- Task 2: Add password hashing to User model
- Task 3: Create login endpoint
- Task 4: Add JWT token generation
- Task 5: Create auth middleware
- Task 6: Add token refresh endpoint
```
---
## Core Requirements
### Exact File Paths Always
Never use vague references:
```
BAD: "Update the user service"
GOOD: "Modify `src/services/user-service.ts`"
```
### Complete Code Samples
Include exact code, not descriptions:
```
BAD: "Add a function that validates email"
GOOD:
```typescript
export function validateEmail(email: string): boolean {
const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
return emailRegex.test(email);
}
```
```
### Expected Output Specifications
Always specify expected command results:
```bash
npm test
# Expected output:
# PASS src/services/user.test.ts
# User validation
# ✓ validates correct email format (3ms)
# ✓ rejects invalid email format (1ms)
# 2 passing
```
---
### Stack-Specific Task Commands
| Stack | Test Command | Lint Command | Build Command |
|-------|-------------|-------------|---------------|
| Python/FastAPI | `pytest -v --cov=src` | `ruff check .` | N/A |
| Python/Django | `python manage.py test` | `ruff check .` | N/A |
| TypeScript/NestJS | `npm test` | `npm run lint` | `npm run build` |
| Next.js | `npm test` or `npx vitest run` | `next lint` | `next build` |
| React (Vite) | `npx vitest run` | `npm run lint` | `npm run build` |
---
## Guiding Principles
### DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- Identify patterns before implementation
- Plan for reusable components
- Note shared utilities needed
### YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
- Only plan what's required now
- Remove speculative features
- Add complexity when justified
### TDD (Test-Driven Development)
Every task follows:
1. Write failing test
2. Verify it fails
3. Implement minimally
4. Verify it passes
5. Refactor if needed
6. Commit
### Frequent Commits
- Commit after each task
- Clear, descriptive messages
- Atomic changes only
---
## Execution Handoff
After plan is complete, offer two implementation pathways:
### Option 1: Subagent-Driven (Current Session)
```
Use the `executing-plans` skill for automated execution with:
- Fresh agent per task
- Code review between tasks
- Quality gates
```
### Option 2: Parallel Session (Separate Worktree)
```
Developer executes in separate environment:
- Read plan file
- Follow tasks sequentially
- Commit after each task
```
---
## Example Plan Snippet
```markdown
# Plan: Add Email Verification
**Required Skill**: executing-plans
## Goal
Add email verification to user registration flow.
## Architecture Overview
Send verification email on registration, validate token on click,
mark user as verified in database.
## Tech Stack
- Node.js, TypeScript
- PostgreSQL
- SendGrid for email
---
## Task 1: Add verified flag to User model
**Files**:
- Modify: `src/models/user.ts`
- Create: `src/migrations/add-verified-flag.ts`
- Test: `src/models/user.test.ts`
**Steps**:
1. Write failing test
```typescript
describe('User model', () => {
it('should have verified flag defaulting to false', () => {
const user = new User({ email: 'test@example.com' });
expect(user.verified).toBe(false);
});
});
```
2. Verify test fails
```bash
npm test -- --grep "verified flag"
# Expected: 1 failing (verified is undefined)
```
3. Add verified field to User model
```typescript
// src/models/user.ts
export class User {
email: string;
verified: boolean = false; // Add this line
// ...
}
```
4. Verify test passes
```bash
npm test -- --grep "verified flag"
# Expected: 1 passing
```
5. Commit
```bash
git add src/models/user.ts src/models/user.test.ts
git commit -m "feat(user): add verified flag with false default"
```
```
---
## Related Skills
- `brainstorming` -- Use before writing plans when requirements are unclear or need exploration
- `executing-plans` -- Use after writing a plan to execute it with subagent-driven development and review gates
- `test-driven-development` -- Plans follow TDD principles; reference this skill for strict red-green-refactor enforcement