Restructure, per the ask that code review be the parent and the other two
dimensions its sub-cases:
- SKILL.md gains a "one engine, three anchors" section. Correctness is the
core and stays inline; performance and security move to their own reference
files, loaded only when selected.
- references/performance-review.md (new) — a universal, stack-agnostic core
(repeated work, growth relationships, retention, copying, contention,
amplification) plus the three-part bar for a performance finding. Defers the
database/web checklist to /performance-audit-static instead of restating it.
- references/security-review.md (new) — trust boundaries and sinks for code
with no web surface, and the one rule that INVERTS relative to correctness:
attacker-equals-victim refutes a security finding but never a correctness
one. Defers the full procedure to /security-audit-static.
- Both audit commands now say they are the specialisation behind their
sub-case, so the narrow entry points still lead back to the skill.
ship-check gains two stages it was missing:
- Step 3, correctness review — the pass neither audit performs: logic and
state defects that compile clean and pass the suite.
- Step 6, independent unsteered review — a fresh session of a second model
(Codex or equivalent), given no checklist and no prior findings, with the
subject computed from a diff rather than described. Every finding is
hand-verified against the code before it enters the packet, since an
unsteered reviewer carries no refutation discipline of its own. The packet
reports whether it ran clean or did not run at all - those are different
signals.
Also carries the working-tree edits already in progress: model-and-orchestration
guidance on both audits, the OWASP A02/A06/A09 backstop, CSP in the
output-encoding bullet, the prompt-injection/agent-abuse bullet, and the Audit
Provenance section (now also naming the second model).
No version bump - not tested against the benchmark yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G42vsxSKL7je39AsHZ5aJm
NOT RELEASED. No version bump - versions stay at 2.0.0 across all 9 plugins and
marketplace.json, because bumping is the release action and this ships only after
it has been tested. On a branch for the same reason.
WHY A SKILL AND NOT A FOURTH COMMAND. /security-audit-static is already mature -
sink analysis, self-refutation with attacker/victim rules, OWASP backstop, fan-out.
Rebuilding that inside something new would duplicate it. The hole in this plugin is
CORRECTNESS: there is no bug-finding review at all. So this is one skill with three
independently activated dimensions that defers to the existing command for security
and points at intended-vs-implemented for the doc-vs-code axis.
THE ANCHOR IS THE AGREEMENT, NOT THE FILE. The defects reviewers miss are rarely
visible inside one file - they are disagreements between two participants that each
read sensibly alone. Engine: map a flow, identify an obligation, inspect EVERY
participant, construct a violating execution, trace the consequence, refute, report.
Two lenses get a forced probe rather than a checklist mention: authority
reconciliation (a requested value is not an applied value) and identity correlation
(is the key unique, stable and live under overlap and reuse).
Refutation discipline is deliberately stricter than the security command's: a
correctness defect can harm only the person who triggered it and still be serious,
so the attacker/victim test does not transfer, and 'keep unless disproved' is too
permissive. Keep / Drop / Unresolved, with unresolved kept out of the findings list.
Parallelism fans out over complete flows, never over files - partitioning by file is
exactly the split that hides cross-boundary defects. Overlapping reads are allowed
and encouraged.
Coverage reports work performed in four states; zero findings is not 'not covered'.
Co-designed with GPT-6 Astra (Codex CLI). Contains no project-specific content: no
repo names, no paths, no bug identifiers, no defect text - verified by scan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G42vsxSKL7je39AsHZ5aJm
Pawel HurynandClaude Opus 5