mirror of
https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills.git
synced 2026-06-10 21:44:56 +03:00
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
description, argument-hint
| description | argument-hint |
|---|---|
| Convert a feature-based roadmap into an outcome-focused roadmap that communicates strategic intent | <roadmap as text, file, or list of planned features> |
/transform-roadmap -- Outcome-Focused Roadmap
Take a list of planned features or an output-focused roadmap and rewrite it as an outcome-focused roadmap that communicates why instead of what.
Invocation
/transform-roadmap [paste your feature list or roadmap]
/transform-roadmap [upload a roadmap doc, spreadsheet, or screenshot]
Workflow
Step 1: Accept the Current Roadmap
Accept in any format:
- Feature list or backlog items
- Roadmap document (Now/Next/Later, quarterly, timeline)
- Spreadsheet or Gantt chart export
- Screenshot of a roadmap tool
Parse each item to extract: feature name, description, target date/timeframe, and any context.
Step 2: Understand Strategic Context
Ask:
- What are the product goals or OKRs for this period?
- Who is the audience for this roadmap? (execs, engineering, customers, board)
- What format do you prefer? (Now/Next/Later, quarterly, timeline)
Step 3: Transform Each Item
Apply the outcome-roadmap skill:
For each feature/output on the roadmap:
- Identify the user or business outcome it's trying to achieve
- Rewrite as an outcome statement: "[Verb] [metric/experience] for [user segment]"
- Group features that serve the same outcome under one initiative
- Add success metrics to each outcome
Before → After examples:
- "Build SSO integration" → "Reduce enterprise onboarding friction — target: 50% faster time-to-first-value for enterprise accounts"
- "Redesign dashboard" → "Help power users find insights faster — target: 30% reduction in time-to-insight"
- "Add CSV export" → "Enable teams to share data outside the product — target: 25% increase in report sharing"
Step 4: Generate Transformed Roadmap
## Outcome-Focused Roadmap: [Product] — [Period]
**Strategic themes**: [2-3 high-level themes]
### Now (Current Quarter)
**Theme: [Strategic Theme]**
| Outcome | Success Metric | Key Initiatives | Status |
|---------|---------------|----------------|--------|
### Next (Next Quarter)
**Theme: [Strategic Theme]**
| Outcome | Success Metric | Key Initiatives | Confidence |
|---------|---------------|----------------|------------|
### Later (Future)
**Theme: [Strategic Theme]**
| Outcome | Success Metric | Key Initiatives | Dependencies |
|---------|---------------|----------------|-------------|
### Transformation Notes
| Original Feature | Transformed Outcome | Why This Framing |
|-----------------|--------------------|-----------------|
### What Changed
[Summary of how the roadmap narrative shifted]
Save as a markdown file.
Step 5: Review
Offer:
- "Want me to add OKR alignment for each outcome?"
- "Should I draft a stakeholder presentation of this roadmap?"
- "Want me to identify risks for the Now items?"
Notes
- Outcomes should be measurable and have a clear "done" state
- Multiple features can map to one outcome — this is a feature, not a bug
- If an output doesn't clearly serve an outcome, flag it for the user to justify or deprioritize
- The audience matters: exec roadmaps should be outcome-only, engineering roadmaps can include deliverables under each outcome
- "Later" items should be less specific — outcomes without committed solutions