mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-08-03 09:20:18 +03:00
mukul975
8cae0648ec
Demand-driven expansion targeting the fastest-growing 2025-2026 threat and
skills categories (ISC2/WEF/CrowdStrike/Mandiant signals):
- AI Security (NEW domain, 12 skills): LLM red-teaming with garak/PyRIT,
prompt injection (direct/indirect/RAG), MCP tool-poisoning, agentic tool
invocation, guardrails, model/data poisoning, system-prompt leakage,
embedding/vector weaknesses, model extraction, continuous red-teaming
- Supply Chain Security (NEW domain, 5 skills): SBOMs, dependency confusion,
malicious-npm triage, typosquatting, SLSA/Sigstore provenance
- Hardware & Firmware Security (NEW domain, 4 skills): CHIPSEC/UEFI audit,
Secure Boot bypass, TPM measured-boot attestation, ESP bootkit hunting
- Identity (10): Entra ID/ROADtools, GraphRunner, AADInternals, ADCS/Certipy,
shadow credentials, coercion, BloodHound CE, device-code phishing, SSO abuse
- Cloud-native (8): Stratus, Pacu, CloudFox, container escape, K8s RBAC,
Falco, Trivy, kube-bench
- Offensive C2 (6): Sliver, Havoc, NetExec, DPAPI, NTLM relay ESC8, redirectors
- DFIR (6): Hayabusa, Chainsaw, KAPE, Velociraptor, EZ Tools, Plaso
- Backfill (4): OpenCTI, MISP, honeytokens, post-quantum crypto migration
Each skill follows the repo taxonomy (SKILL.md + references/{standards,api-reference}.md
+ scripts/agent.py + LICENSE), with researched real tool commands (no placeholders),
complete frontmatter, and ATT&CK/ATLAS + NIST CSF mappings. Updates README domain
table, skill count, and index.json.
30 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Standards and References - Detecting Typosquatting Packages
|
|
|
|
## MITRE ATT&CK
|
|
|
|
| Technique ID | Name | Tactic | Rationale |
|
|
|--------------|------|--------|-----------|
|
|
| T1195.002 | Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain | Initial Access | A typosquatted package is the malicious artifact the attacker gets installed in place of the legitimate dependency, compromising the victim's software supply chain at install time. |
|
|
|
|
## NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
|
|
|
|
| ID | Name | Rationale |
|
|
|----|------|-----------|
|
|
| ID.RA-09 | The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software is assessed prior to acquisition and use | Pre-installation typosquat screening is exactly the activity of assessing a package's authenticity before it enters the environment. |
|
|
|
|
## Official Resources
|
|
|
|
- typomania (Rust Foundation): https://github.com/rustfoundation/typomania
|
|
- typogard (original research tool): https://github.com/mt3443/typogard
|
|
- "Defending Against Package Typosquatting" (Taylor et al., University of Kansas)
|
|
- Microsoft OSSGadget: https://github.com/microsoft/OSSGadget
|
|
- IQTLabs pypi-scan: https://github.com/IQTLabs/pypi-scan
|
|
- ecosyste-ms typosquatting-dataset: https://github.com/ecosyste-ms/typosquatting-dataset
|
|
- OWASP CI/CD Security Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/
|
|
- top-pypi-packages corpus: https://hugovk.github.io/top-pypi-packages/
|
|
|
|
## Key Research
|
|
|
|
- Rust Foundation: typomania powers crates.io typosquatting detection
|
|
- JFrog / Sonatype: annual reports on registry typosquatting and "slopsquatting" trends
|