Files
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/defending-llms-with-guardrails/references/standards.md
T
mukul975 8cae0648ec Add 55 new skills across 3 new domains + 6 undercovered areas (762 -> 817)
Demand-driven expansion targeting the fastest-growing 2025-2026 threat and
skills categories (ISC2/WEF/CrowdStrike/Mandiant signals):

- AI Security (NEW domain, 12 skills): LLM red-teaming with garak/PyRIT,
  prompt injection (direct/indirect/RAG), MCP tool-poisoning, agentic tool
  invocation, guardrails, model/data poisoning, system-prompt leakage,
  embedding/vector weaknesses, model extraction, continuous red-teaming
- Supply Chain Security (NEW domain, 5 skills): SBOMs, dependency confusion,
  malicious-npm triage, typosquatting, SLSA/Sigstore provenance
- Hardware & Firmware Security (NEW domain, 4 skills): CHIPSEC/UEFI audit,
  Secure Boot bypass, TPM measured-boot attestation, ESP bootkit hunting
- Identity (10): Entra ID/ROADtools, GraphRunner, AADInternals, ADCS/Certipy,
  shadow credentials, coercion, BloodHound CE, device-code phishing, SSO abuse
- Cloud-native (8): Stratus, Pacu, CloudFox, container escape, K8s RBAC,
  Falco, Trivy, kube-bench
- Offensive C2 (6): Sliver, Havoc, NetExec, DPAPI, NTLM relay ESC8, redirectors
- DFIR (6): Hayabusa, Chainsaw, KAPE, Velociraptor, EZ Tools, Plaso
- Backfill (4): OpenCTI, MISP, honeytokens, post-quantum crypto migration

Each skill follows the repo taxonomy (SKILL.md + references/{standards,api-reference}.md
+ scripts/agent.py + LICENSE), with researched real tool commands (no placeholders),
complete frontmatter, and ATT&CK/ATLAS + NIST CSF mappings. Updates README domain
table, skill count, and index.json.
2026-06-22 19:08:16 +02:00

29 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown

# Standards and Framework Mapping
## NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0 / GenAI Profile NIST AI 600-1)
| ID | Name | Rationale |
|----|------|-----------|
| MANAGE-2.1 | Resources required to manage AI risks are documented and put into action | Deploying Llama Guard / NeMo / LLM Guard is the operational control that manages identified LLM safety risks at runtime. |
## MITRE ATLAS
| ID | Name | Rationale |
|----|------|-----------|
| AML.T0054 | LLM Jailbreak | The guardrail layer is the primary mitigation that detects and blocks jailbreak attempts before/after model inference. |
| AML.T0051 | LLM Prompt Injection | Input rails and the PromptInjection scanner block direct injection attempts. |
| AML.T0051.001 | LLM Prompt Injection: Indirect | Retrieval/input scanning blocks injection embedded in retrieved or tool-returned content. |
| AML.T0057 | LLM Data Leakage | Output scanners (Sensitive, Secrets, Deanonymize) prevent leakage of PII, secrets, and instructions. |
## OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025)
| ID | Name | Rationale |
|----|------|-----------|
| LLM01 | Prompt Injection | Guardrails are the recommended runtime mitigation for direct and indirect injection. |
| LLM02 | Sensitive Information Disclosure | Output PII/secrets scanners prevent disclosure. |
| LLM07 | System Prompt Leakage | Input/output rails detect attempts to extract and leak the system prompt. |
## MLCommons Hazard Taxonomy (Llama Guard 3 categories)
S1 Violent Crimes · S2 Non-Violent Crimes · S3 Sex-Related Crimes · S4 Child Sexual Exploitation · S5 Defamation · S6 Specialized Advice · S7 Privacy · S8 Intellectual Property · S9 Indiscriminate Weapons · S10 Hate · S11 Suicide & Self-Harm · S12 Sexual Content · S13 Elections · S14 Code Interpreter Abuse.