mirror of
https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git
synced 2026-08-04 18:00:18 +03:00
Mahipal
2fb6a9faff
Each rewritten description now states both what the skill does (concrete capability, named tools/artifacts) and an explicit when-to-use trigger, improving agent discovery/activation. Grounded in each skill's own body; changes confined to the `description` field only (bodies and all other frontmatter untouched). Produced by a gated audit->rewrite->recheck loop (548 -> 0 flagged) with a sampled anti-invention check (0 ungrounded). Schema: 817/817 pass. Framework-ID gate: 0 defects.
102 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
102 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: detecting-pass-the-hash-attacks
|
|
description: Detect Pass-the-Hash (T1550.002) attacks by analyzing NTLM authentication patterns, flagging Type 3 logons using NTLM where Kerberos would be expected, and correlating with credential-dumping indicators. Use when threat hunting for lateral movement via stolen NTLM hashes, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious NTLM logons, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.
|
|
domain: cybersecurity
|
|
subdomain: threat-hunting
|
|
tags:
|
|
- threat-hunting
|
|
- mitre-attack
|
|
- pass-the-hash
|
|
- credential-access
|
|
- t1550
|
|
- proactive-detection
|
|
version: '1.0'
|
|
author: mahipal
|
|
license: Apache-2.0
|
|
d3fend_techniques:
|
|
- Token Binding
|
|
- Execution Isolation
|
|
- Restore Access
|
|
- Application Protocol Command Analysis
|
|
- Process Termination
|
|
nist_csf:
|
|
- DE.CM-01
|
|
- DE.AE-02
|
|
- DE.AE-07
|
|
- ID.RA-05
|
|
mitre_attack:
|
|
- T1046
|
|
- T1057
|
|
- T1082
|
|
- T1083
|
|
- T1003
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Detecting Pass The Hash Attacks
|
|
|
|
## When to Use
|
|
|
|
- When proactively hunting for indicators of detecting pass the hash attacks in the environment
|
|
- After threat intelligence indicates active campaigns using these techniques
|
|
- During incident response to scope compromise related to these techniques
|
|
- When EDR or SIEM alerts trigger on related indicators
|
|
- During periodic security assessments and purple team exercises
|
|
|
|
## Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
- EDR platform with process and network telemetry (CrowdStrike, MDE, SentinelOne)
|
|
- SIEM with relevant log data ingested (Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel)
|
|
- Sysmon deployed with comprehensive configuration
|
|
- Windows Security Event Log forwarding enabled
|
|
- Threat intelligence feeds for IOC correlation
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. **Formulate Hypothesis**: Define a testable hypothesis based on threat intelligence or ATT&CK gap analysis.
|
|
2. **Identify Data Sources**: Determine which logs and telemetry are needed to validate or refute the hypothesis.
|
|
3. **Execute Queries**: Run detection queries against SIEM and EDR platforms to collect relevant events.
|
|
4. **Analyze Results**: Examine query results for anomalies, correlating across multiple data sources.
|
|
5. **Validate Findings**: Distinguish true positives from false positives through contextual analysis.
|
|
6. **Correlate Activity**: Link findings to broader attack chains and threat actor TTPs.
|
|
7. **Document and Report**: Record findings, update detection rules, and recommend response actions.
|
|
|
|
## Key Concepts
|
|
|
|
| Concept | Description |
|
|
|---------|-------------|
|
|
| T1550.002 | Pass the Hash |
|
|
| T1550.003 | Pass the Ticket |
|
|
| T1078 | Valid Accounts |
|
|
|
|
## Tools & Systems
|
|
|
|
| Tool | Purpose |
|
|
|------|---------|
|
|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | EDR telemetry and threat detection |
|
|
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Advanced hunting with KQL |
|
|
| Splunk Enterprise | SIEM log analysis with SPL queries |
|
|
| Elastic Security | Detection rules and investigation timeline |
|
|
| Sysmon | Detailed Windows event monitoring |
|
|
| Velociraptor | Endpoint artifact collection and hunting |
|
|
| Sigma Rules | Cross-platform detection rule format |
|
|
|
|
## Common Scenarios
|
|
|
|
1. **Scenario 1**: Mimikatz sekurlsa::pth with stolen NTLM hash
|
|
2. **Scenario 2**: Impacket psexec.py remote execution with hash
|
|
3. **Scenario 3**: CrackMapExec hash spraying across hosts
|
|
4. **Scenario 4**: WMI lateral movement via pass-the-hash
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Hunt ID: TH-DETECT-[DATE]-[SEQ]
|
|
Technique: T1550.002
|
|
Host: [Hostname]
|
|
User: [Account context]
|
|
Evidence: [Log entries, process trees, network data]
|
|
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
|
|
Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
|
|
Recommended Action: [Containment, investigation, monitoring]
|
|
```
|