Files
T
mukul975 efca3ec611 feat: add NIST CSF 2.0 nist_csf field to all 754 cybersecurity skills
Mapped every skill to NIST CSF 2.0 subcategory IDs (GV/ID/PR/DE/RS/RC functions)
based on subdomain and content analysis. Restores 11 skills corrupted during
prior rebase, re-enriching with ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF, and CSF 2.0 fields.

All 754 skills now carry structured mappings for all 5 security frameworks:
- MITRE ATT&CK (in tags)
- MITRE ATLAS v5.5 (atlas_techniques)
- MITRE D3FEND v1.3 (d3fend_techniques)
- NIST AI RMF 1.0 (nist_ai_rmf)
- NIST CSF 2.0 (nist_csf)
2026-04-06 11:17:40 +02:00

321 lines
8.6 KiB
Markdown

---
name: implementing-pod-security-admission-controller
description: Implement Kubernetes Pod Security Admission to enforce baseline and restricted security profiles at namespace
level using built-in admission controller.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: container-security
tags:
- kubernetes
- pod-security-admission
- psa
- pod-security-standards
- admission-controller
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- PR.IR-01
- ID.AM-08
- DE.CM-01
---
# Implementing Pod Security Admission Controller
## Overview
Pod Security Admission (PSA) is a built-in Kubernetes admission controller (stable since v1.25) that enforces Pod Security Standards at the namespace level. It replaces the deprecated PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) and provides three security profiles: Privileged, Baseline, and Restricted, with three enforcement modes: enforce, audit, and warn.
## When to Use
- When deploying or configuring implementing pod security admission controller capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
## Prerequisites
- Kubernetes v1.25+ (PSA is stable/GA)
- kubectl with cluster-admin access
- No dependency on external tools - PSA is built into kube-apiserver
## Pod Security Standards
### Privileged Profile
- **Unrestricted** - No restrictions applied
- Use case: System-level pods (kube-system, monitoring)
### Baseline Profile
- **Minimally restrictive** - Prevents known privilege escalation
- Blocks: privileged containers, hostPID, hostIPC, hostNetwork, hostPorts, certain volume types, adding capabilities beyond runtime defaults
### Restricted Profile
- **Heavily restricted** - Follows security best practices
- Requires: non-root, drop ALL capabilities, seccomp RuntimeDefault, read-only root filesystem considerations
- Blocks: Everything in Baseline plus running as root, privilege escalation, non-approved volume types
## Enforcement Modes
| Mode | Behavior | Use Case |
|------|----------|----------|
| enforce | Reject pods violating policy | Production enforcement |
| audit | Log violations to audit log | Pre-enforcement assessment |
| warn | Show warnings to user | Developer feedback |
## Implementation
### Apply to Namespace via Labels
```yaml
# Restricted enforcement with audit and warn
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: production
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: v1.28
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: v1.28
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: v1.28
```
```yaml
# Baseline enforcement for staging
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: staging
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: baseline
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: v1.28
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: v1.28
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: v1.28
```
```yaml
# Privileged for system namespaces
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: kube-system
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged
```
### Apply Labels with kubectl
```bash
# Set restricted enforcement
kubectl label namespace production \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version=v1.28 \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted
# Set baseline enforcement
kubectl label namespace staging \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=baseline \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted
# Check current labels
kubectl get namespace production -o jsonpath='{.metadata.labels}' | jq .
```
## Dry-Run Testing
```bash
# Test what would happen with restricted policy on a namespace
kubectl label --dry-run=server --overwrite namespace staging \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted
# Output shows existing pods that would violate the policy
# Warning: existing pods in namespace "staging" violate the new PodSecurity enforce level "restricted:latest"
```
## Cluster-Wide Defaults (AdmissionConfiguration)
```yaml
# /etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
apiVersion: apiserver.config.k8s.io/v1
kind: AdmissionConfiguration
plugins:
- name: PodSecurity
configuration:
apiVersion: pod-security.admission.config.k8s.io/v1
kind: PodSecurityConfiguration
defaults:
enforce: baseline
enforce-version: latest
audit: restricted
audit-version: latest
warn: restricted
warn-version: latest
exemptions:
usernames: []
runtimeClasses: []
namespaces:
- kube-system
- kube-public
- kube-node-lease
- calico-system
- gatekeeper-system
- monitoring
- falco
```
### Apply to API Server
```bash
# Add to kube-apiserver manifests
# /etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yaml
spec:
containers:
- command:
- kube-apiserver
- --admission-control-config-file=/etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
volumeMounts:
- name: psa-config
mountPath: /etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
readOnly: true
volumes:
- name: psa-config
hostPath:
path: /etc/kubernetes/psa-config.yaml
type: File
```
## Compliant Pod Examples
### Restricted-Compliant Pod
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: restricted-pod
namespace: production
spec:
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 1000
runAsGroup: 3000
fsGroup: 2000
seccompProfile:
type: RuntimeDefault
automountServiceAccountToken: false
containers:
- name: app
image: myregistry/myapp:v1.0.0
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
capabilities:
drop:
- ALL
resources:
limits:
cpu: 500m
memory: 256Mi
requests:
cpu: 100m
memory: 128Mi
volumeMounts:
- name: tmp
mountPath: /tmp
volumes:
- name: tmp
emptyDir: {}
```
### Baseline-Compliant Pod
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: baseline-pod
namespace: staging
spec:
containers:
- name: app
image: myregistry/myapp:v1.0.0
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
resources:
limits:
cpu: 500m
memory: 256Mi
```
## Migration from PodSecurityPolicy
### Step 1: Audit Current State
```bash
# Check existing PSPs
kubectl get psp
# Check which service accounts use which PSP
kubectl get clusterrolebinding -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.roleRef.name | startswith("psp-")) | {name: .metadata.name, subjects: .subjects}'
```
### Step 2: Map PSP to PSA Profiles
```bash
# For each namespace, determine required PSA level
for ns in $(kubectl get ns -o jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}'); do
echo "Namespace: $ns"
kubectl label --dry-run=server namespace $ns \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted 2>&1 | head -5
done
```
### Step 3: Apply PSA Labels (Audit First)
```bash
# Start with audit mode
kubectl label namespace production \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted
```
### Step 4: Review and Fix Violations
```bash
# Check audit logs for violations
kubectl get events --field-selector reason=FailedCreate -A
```
### Step 5: Enable Enforcement
```bash
kubectl label namespace production \
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted
```
## Monitoring
```bash
# Check PSA violations in events
kubectl get events --all-namespaces --field-selector reason=FailedCreate
# Check audit logs
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | grep "pod-security.kubernetes.io"
# List namespace PSA labels
kubectl get namespaces -L pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce
```
## Best Practices
1. **Start with audit+warn** before enforce to assess impact
2. **Use dry-run** to test enforcement before applying
3. **Exempt system namespaces** (kube-system, monitoring) in cluster defaults
4. **Pin version** (enforce-version) for predictable behavior across upgrades
5. **Set cluster-wide baseline** as default, then restrict specific namespaces
6. **Combine with Gatekeeper** for additional custom policies beyond PSA
7. **Use restricted profile** for all production workloads
8. **Document exemptions** with clear justification