docs(readme): remove the Related Resources section (#878)

The section held one entry, describing awesome-openclaw-agents as "derived
from this repo". That claim does not hold up: its README never mentions this
project, and only 2 of our 265 agent names appear anywhere in its list —
"incident responder" and "ux researcher", both generic role names that are
coincidence rather than lineage. It was last pushed 2026-05-25.

Asserting a derivation the other project does not claim, and that the content
does not support, is not something to leave in the README.

The section was also generating work it could not pay for. #876 asked to add a
third-party workbench to it — a reasonable thing to attempt precisely because
the section existed — and declining that meant explaining a curation standard
the one existing entry did not meet.

Removing it rather than correcting the line: a list of one, kept honest by
hand, invites requests to grow it and gives no way to judge them.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Sitarzewski
2026-09-21 21:38:51 -05:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 652277fba1
commit 053ddbbf39
-6
View File
@@ -1096,12 +1096,6 @@ Want to add a translation? Open an issue and we'll link it here.
---
## 🔗 Related Resources
- [awesome-openclaw-agents](https://github.com/mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents) — Community-maintained OpenClaw agent collection (derived from this repo)
---
## 📜 License
MIT License - Use freely, commercially or personally. Attribution appreciated but not required.