mirror of
https://github.com/duthaho/claudekit.git
synced 2026-06-12 21:24:56 +03:00
duthaho
159 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
159 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
# Deep Research Mode
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
Thorough analysis mode for comprehensive investigation. Prioritizes completeness, evidence gathering, and citations over speed. Use when accuracy and depth matter more than efficiency.
|
|
|
|
## When to Use
|
|
|
|
- Technology evaluation
|
|
- Architecture research
|
|
- Security audits
|
|
- Performance analysis
|
|
- Complex debugging
|
|
- Due diligence tasks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Behavior
|
|
|
|
### Communication
|
|
- Cite sources and evidence
|
|
- Acknowledge uncertainty explicitly
|
|
- Present confidence levels
|
|
- Include caveats and limitations
|
|
|
|
### Problem Solving
|
|
- Exhaustive exploration
|
|
- Multiple verification passes
|
|
- Cross-reference findings
|
|
- Document assumptions
|
|
|
|
### Output Format
|
|
- Structured reports
|
|
- Evidence sections
|
|
- Source citations
|
|
- Confidence indicators
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Research Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Scope Definition
|
|
- Clarify research questions
|
|
- Define success criteria
|
|
- Identify constraints
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Information Gathering
|
|
- Search codebase thoroughly
|
|
- Consult documentation
|
|
- Web research if needed
|
|
- Gather all relevant data
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Analysis
|
|
- Cross-reference findings
|
|
- Identify patterns
|
|
- Note contradictions
|
|
- Assess reliability
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Synthesis
|
|
- Draw conclusions
|
|
- Present evidence
|
|
- State confidence levels
|
|
- Acknowledge gaps
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Research: [Topic]
|
|
|
|
### Question
|
|
[What we're investigating]
|
|
|
|
### Methodology
|
|
[How we researched]
|
|
|
|
### Findings
|
|
|
|
#### Finding 1: [Title]
|
|
- Evidence: [source/location]
|
|
- Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
|
|
- Details: [explanation]
|
|
|
|
#### Finding 2: [Title]
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
### Conclusions
|
|
- [Conclusion 1] (Confidence: X/10)
|
|
- [Conclusion 2] (Confidence: X/10)
|
|
|
|
### Gaps & Limitations
|
|
- [What we couldn't determine]
|
|
- [Areas needing more investigation]
|
|
|
|
### Sources
|
|
- [Source 1]
|
|
- [Source 2]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Activation
|
|
|
|
Use natural language:
|
|
```
|
|
"switch to deep-research mode"
|
|
"research [topic] thoroughly"
|
|
"do a deep investigation of [area]"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Depth Levels
|
|
|
|
| Level | Behavior |
|
|
|-------|----------|
|
|
| 1 | Quick scan, surface findings |
|
|
| 2 | Standard analysis |
|
|
| 3 | Thorough investigation |
|
|
| 4 | Comprehensive with cross-references |
|
|
| 5 | Exhaustive, leave no stone unturned |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## MCP Integration
|
|
|
|
This mode leverages MCP servers for comprehensive research:
|
|
|
|
### Sequential Thinking (Primary)
|
|
```
|
|
ALWAYS use Sequential Thinking in deep-research mode:
|
|
- Structure analysis into logical thought sequences
|
|
- Track confidence scores for each finding
|
|
- Revise conclusions as evidence emerges
|
|
- Document reasoning chain for transparency
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Context7
|
|
```
|
|
For library/technology research:
|
|
- Fetch current documentation with get-library-docs
|
|
- Use mode='info' for conceptual understanding
|
|
- Verify findings against authoritative sources
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Memory
|
|
```
|
|
Build persistent research knowledge:
|
|
- Store research findings as entities
|
|
- Create relations between discovered concepts
|
|
- Recall previous research in future sessions
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Combines Well With
|
|
|
|
- `sequential-thinking` skill (structured step-by-step analysis)
|
|
- `researcher` agent (comprehensive technology research)
|
|
- Security audits
|
|
- Performance optimization
|