Files
pm-skills/pm-execution/commands/pre-mortem.md
T
Pawel Huryn 77dbdfa1b9 v1.0
2026-03-02 00:36:23 +01:00

105 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown

---
description: Run a pre-mortem risk analysis on a PRD, launch plan, or feature — identify what could go wrong before it does
argument-hint: "<PRD, plan, or feature description>"
---
# /pre-mortem -- Pre-Launch Risk Analysis
Imagine your launch has failed. Now work backward to figure out why. This command applies the Tigers/Paper Tigers/Elephants framework to surface real risks and create mitigation plans.
## Invocation
```
/pre-mortem [paste or upload a PRD, launch plan, or feature spec]
/pre-mortem We're launching a self-serve billing portal next month
```
## Workflow
### Step 1: Accept the Plan
Accept in any format: PRD, feature spec, launch plan, project brief, or verbal description. The more detail provided, the sharper the risk analysis.
### Step 2: Risk Identification
Apply the **pre-mortem** skill:
Imagine the product has launched and failed. Generate risks across categories:
- **Technical**: Performance, scalability, integration failures, data issues
- **User**: Adoption barriers, usability problems, unmet expectations
- **Business**: Revenue impact, competitive response, market timing
- **Operational**: Support load, documentation gaps, training needs
- **Dependencies**: Third-party services, cross-team handoffs, regulatory
### Step 3: Classify Risks
Categorize each risk:
**Tigers** — Real, substantive risks that could cause failure
- Assess severity: Launch-blocking / Fast-follow / Track
- For launch-blocking Tigers: immediate mitigation required
- For fast-follow Tigers: plan to address within first sprint post-launch
- For track Tigers: monitor but don't delay launch
**Paper Tigers** — Risks that feel scary but are overblown
- Explain why the concern is manageable
- Note what would need to change for this to become a real Tiger
**Elephants** — Unspoken risks the team knows about but avoids discussing
- Surface political, organizational, or uncomfortable risks
- Frame constructively with suggested conversation starters
### Step 4: Generate Pre-Mortem Report
```
## Pre-Mortem: [Feature/Launch]
**Date**: [today]
**Status**: [Draft / Reviewed]
### Risk Summary
- **Tigers**: [count] ([launch-blocking], [fast-follow], [track])
- **Paper Tigers**: [count]
- **Elephants**: [count]
### Launch-Blocking Tigers
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Owner | Deadline |
|---|------|-----------|--------|-----------|-------|----------|
### Fast-Follow Tigers
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Planned Response | Owner |
|---|------|-----------|--------|-----------------|-------|
### Track Tigers
[Risks to monitor post-launch with trigger conditions]
### Paper Tigers
[Concerns that seem big but are manageable — with reasoning]
### Elephants in the Room
[Uncomfortable truths the team should discuss]
### Go/No-Go Checklist
- [ ] All launch-blocking Tigers mitigated
- [ ] Fast-follow plan documented and assigned
- [ ] Monitoring in place for Track Tigers
- [ ] Rollback plan defined
- [ ] Support team briefed
```
Save as markdown.
### Step 5: Offer Next Steps
- "Want me to **update the PRD** with risk mitigations?"
- "Should I **create test scenarios** for the riskiest areas?"
- "Want me to **draft a launch checklist** from these findings?"
## Notes
- The best pre-mortems happen when the plan is 80% done — early enough to change course, late enough to have substance
- Push past the obvious risks — the most dangerous risks are the ones nobody mentions
- Elephants are the highest-value output — surfacing what the team avoids discussing
- For each Tiger, the mitigation should be specific and assignable, not "be careful"
- If the pre-mortem reveals too many launch-blocking Tigers, recommend delaying or phasing the launch